Εθνικά κοινοβούλια και ενωσιακή οικοδόμηση
View file
- Link:
- http://library.panteion.gr:8080/dspace/handle/123456789/124
- Digital library:
-
Πάντειον Πανεπιστήμιο - Ψηφιακή Βιβλιοθήκη Πάνδημος
- Collection:
-
Τμήμα Δικαίου, Μεταπτυχιακές εργασίες
- Subjects
- Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση European Union Νομοθετικά σώματα -- Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση, Χώρες της Legislative bodies -- European Union countries
- Description:
- Διπλωματική εργασία - Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο. Γενικό Τμήμα Δικαίου, ΠΜΣ "Δίκαιο και Ευρωπαϊκή Ενοποίηση", κατεύθυνση Δημόσιο Δίκαιο, 2006 Βιβλιογραφία: σ. 89-95 Η βιβλιοθήκη διαθέτει αντίτυπο σε έντυπη μορφή National Parliaments, as far as European Union is concerned, are thought to be‘late-comers’ or ‘losers’ in its ‘construction’. But, could National Parliaments take an active part in
the project? In this study , we find out that the majority of National Parliaments , in the frame of their internal organization , had never had the power to make decisions on their own initiative or
even exercise an effective control over the acts of national Governments , despite the fact that within a democratic State, National Parliaments are, formally, the ‘Kings’, as they represent people.
This contrast can be explained, since, the Government, because of its structure and action techniques , has always been a lot of steps ahead and this is why EU constitutes the achievement and the
‘child’ of the Governments. In the First Part our effort has concentrated, ( First Chapter) , on presenting consicely the institution of ‘National Parliaments’ and enlighting some aspects of the
peculiar and complicated decision - making process of the Union., in order to understand deeply the dynamics of these two institutions. The more we know about these two characters, the better we
approach their relationship. In the Second Chapter , we are presenting the relationshipbetween National Parliaments and EU , from two points of view. : In the first place we are dealing with the way
and the extent National Parliaments have entered the statutory framework of the Union, as an aspect of the EU “nationalization” Secondly , we focus on the way and the degree EU has affected National
Parliaments , on the execution of their internal duties , with relation to EU policies , as an aspect of their ‘europeanisation’. In the first case, one may realize that EU has allowed National
Parliaments to enter its world , but from a distance , still leaving an open door fora future embodiment. In the second case, it becomes obvious that National Parliaments get better and more
information now about European laws, from their starting point till their passing, from their governments. Right information means better scrutiny capabilities. National Parliaments have the
opportunity to keep in touch with Governments and take part in the decision making process of the Union, There is a change for adopting an active rather than a reactive behavior –as they used to
have-. The technocracy of specialized committees, set up in the frame of National Parliaments contributesto a great extent to these tasks In the Second Part , we try to find out the deeper and wider
aspects of the relationship between National Parliaments and EU , its subconscious , so as to explain the reality of this relationship easily. So, we observe the relationship in the light of the
meaning ofthe ‘State’, as the State was established and developed at the same time with National Parliaments and EU tends to adopt the shape of a ‘State’ itselft . Does EU repeat what happened
centuries ago to the States , starting being a State , while the European Parliament , parallely, is becomingwhat National Parliaments are now.? We examine as well the conflict between the
intergovernmental and the supranational element , which has its roots in the fundamental disagreement between Functionalists and Federalists , about what form EU should have. Functionalists have been
of the opinion thatEU is mainly a function , an efficient mechanism of bringing nations together , a political and law producting factory which belongs to the member states , and that is why it
should have and maintain an ‘impersonal’ character. Federalists support that EU should be a Federation, a real State , apolitical Union , with its own constitution. 10 The demand for greater
involvement of National Parliaments in EU , is based on the view that EU is characterized by democratic deficit. The question is: Is there a democratic deficit in EU? How can we answer this question?
Apart from this , we shouldtake into account that nowadays Democracy can be achieved by more and direct ways. We end up with the remark that the relationship between National Parliaments and EU
depends on the basic and fundamental relationship , for the law and the politics , between Democracy and financial freedom of individuals. Which of them predominates over the other? Liberal
Democracies of today are characterized by a problematic Democracy and an increased liberty. If we manage to define this relationship , we will be able to figure out a lot more about the progress of
the relationship between National Parliamentsand EU. του Ευάγγελου Γ. Πουρνάρα ΠΜΣ Δίκαιο και Ευρωπαϊκή Ενοποίηση, Κατεύθυνση Δημόσιο Δίκαιο
- Creator:
- Πουρνάρας, Ευάγγελος Γ.
- Contributors:
- Φουντεδάκη, Πηνελόπη Κανελλοπούλου, Νέδα Πασσάς, Αργύρης Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο, Γενικό Τμήμα Δικαίου
- Date:
- 2007-07-02
- Format
- 1436905 bytes
- Format
- 95σ.
- Format
- application/pdf
- Language
- el
- Publisher
- Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών
- Type
- Μεταπτυχιακές Εργασίες
- Visits:
- 65
- Rate it :
-
- Access:
- Instructions in case access is denied
No Comments. Share your comments
All fields are necessary. Your email will appear in the page. It is used only for security reasons!